Laura’s Winning Ideas

Proposal Expert, Laura Ricci, Muses on How She Reached Her 85% Hit Rate, Creating and Managing Dynamic Teams and Living Through Turnarounds Supporting Good People Doing Great Things

Amaze Your Proposal Team With This Comprehension Stunt

Filed under: Change Actions, Organizational Development, Proposals, Tactics and Tools — LRicci at 10:35 am on Sunday, May 6, 2007

Some proposal professionals find themselves pretty low in the pecking order. If the team doesn’t understand why they should defer to your judgment in areas of your expertise, you’ll struggle to contribute your talents.

Here’s a demonstration that has convinced proposal teams to hand over control of the document to the proposal professionals.

As we wait for the group to assemble, pick out two early arrivers. Hand a copy of The Wall Street Journal to one person, preferably the least educated in the room. Then, hand a copy of People Magazine to another person, preferably the first Ph.D. to arrive. Ask each of them to pick out one article and read it before the meeting begins. Then take away the newspaper and magazine when the meeting begins.

After some time, maybe when you are up on the agenda, or at the end of the meeting, ask each of your readers to describe the article they read for you before the meeting began. The reader of The Wall Street Journal will likely recall a good deal about the story they read. Sometimes they recall an amazing amount of detail. You can quiz them about whether they have read a lot on this topic previously.Photo courtesy of Digiology at Morguefile

Then, ask the reader of People Magazine about the article they read. If they are lucky, they will recall that it had a picture of Brad Pitt. They will struggle to remember much else.

Why would this be?

The Wall Street Journal cherishes comprehension and works hard to maintain excellent typography to help readers remember more of what they read.

People Magazine works hard to minimize comprehension. This is because there are only so many photos of Brad Pitt, and only so many comments that can be made about them, before the reader realizes that they are pretty much recycled content.

Which is your proposal?

Do you create documents readers remember? Or do you create snappy looking fancy documents impossible to remember?

Related Posts:

  • Abbreviations You Should Purge
  • Fonts for Proposals, Reports, and Probably Websites Too
  • More Ways to Accomplish Zero Comprehension
  • SMPS Chicago Regional Conference May 10-11
  • Proposal Terms for Insiders Only
  • 5 Comments »

    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by johno

    May 7, 2007 @ 1:10 am

    Interesting idea. But I think that there’s a whole lot more to “comprehension” than good typography.
    I also think that perhaps you miss the point somewhat: People Magazine wishes its readers to remember only two things (borrowing from your example): Brad Pitt and the source, that is where they read it; they just wish to reinforce the connection between celebrity and their brand, namely “People Magazine”.
    The actual copy content of “People Magazine” is difficult to recall because there is so little of it - again, the copy is simply there as a frame to the real content, the photos.
    So, I do think that your proposal is interesting but, I think that it demonstrates not the difference between the memorable and the easily forgotten; but the difference between simply attempting to reinforce a brand, or informing.

    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by Sitting on the Fence

    May 7, 2007 @ 9:46 am

    I can’t figure out why we are so saturated with the Jolie-Pitt family anyway. We need to let them live their lives and build someone else up to sell magazines. If it can be done with the Jolie-Pitts, it can be done with anyone else.

    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by johno

    May 7, 2007 @ 12:34 pm

    Well, there’s a market for it; each to their own. Anyway, I like the original proposal idea - may well try it myself. Would be interesting to try it with, say, two different-targeted blogs…

    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by LRicci

    May 7, 2007 @ 2:33 pm

    JohnO,

    Agreed. The point to be made however is that non-professionals misinterpret “pretty” with “effective” and proposal professionals need a demonstration that proves the benefit of using good design to communicate effectively.

    I visited your blog. Love the post about Georgia Russell!

    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by LRicci

    May 7, 2007 @ 2:36 pm

    Sitting on the Fence,

    Not to worry. Time changes all things. I used to use Richard Gere and Julia Roberts as my examples for this exercise.

    The appetite for gossip eventually moves on to fresh faces.

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    Leave a comment

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>